The difficult situation of Turkey’s press told by well-known journalists, the effects of European solidarity initiatives, and the prospects for the future. A report of the event “Turkey’s Media Under Siege”, covered by Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT).
30/11/2018 – by Fazıla Mat
Turkey’s press is under siege. More than 90% of national media is controlled by pro-government companies. Over 160 journalists are in jail, including 129 as a result of the coup attempt in July 2016. After that date, 54 newspapers were closed – plus 6 news agencies, 24 radio stations, 17 television networks, and 20 magazines. Unfortunately, it seems that public opinion in Europe has become accustomed to such news and has almost accepted that Turkey is turning into an “Islamist Turkmenistan”.
These are the premises and some of the comments emerged from the event organised last Wednesday by the International Press Institute (IPI) in collaboration with German daily WELT in Berlin’s House of the European Union. Many leading journalists and jurists took the floor and gave direct testimony to the conditions in which media professionals continue to carry out their work in Turkey, with a stubborn look to the future. In addition to describing the difficulties they face on a daily basis, the debate also focused on Europe’s role in defending fundamental rights in Turkey.
What about Europe’s role?
“Europe must make a decision. It has to decide whether it wants to keep engaging with Turkey or abandon it”, said Nevşin Mengü, recently fired after being an anchorwoman at CNN Turkey for several years. “But if it abandons it, it will have to acknowledge that an Islamist Turkmenistan will be at its borders”, the journalist added, “and deal with this fact”.
“If this event had been organised two years ago, there would have been many more people than today”, was the opening line by Turkish-German journalist Deniz Yücel, released last February from the Turkish prison of Silivri after being held in custody for over a year. The German authorities had taken decisive action for the reporter’s release. In the still ongoing trial, the Turkish judiciary has requested up to 18 years in prison.
“Turkey is not just any country for Germany. There is no German who has not visited Turkey at least once in their life, who does not have a Turkish friend or neighbour. In addition, Turkey until recently was a country that wanted to join the European Union. This is why the reaction to the country’s authoritarian turn in the last 5 years has been stronger here than in other Western European countries”, said Yücel.
“My arrest has helped increase this attention and my name has become a symbol to talk about the situation of the Turkish press in general. Unfortunately, however, when I stopped being a symbol – because I was released – the interest of the public fell too”.
Yücel brought the example of Turkish-German online newspaper TAZ , founded 2 years ago and entirely supported by readers’ subscriptions. “We note that this year the amount necessary to support editorial activities is being reached with great difficulty, unlike in past years. Unfortunately, this is a sign that both the public and the German government are getting used to the idea that Turkey is a lost cause”.
The importance of mobilization
At the same time, however, the positive role of Europe, of the EU institutions, of the Council of Europe, and of the organisations that in recent years have mobilised to support press freedom in Turkey is undeniable.
Fatih Polat, editor of the independent newspaper Evrensel, reminded how important the presence of international observers is to the processes that affect colleagues every day.
“Solidarity influences the attitude of judges in the courtroom. When there are external observers, they feel compelled to explain the decisions. In one of the trials I have witnessed, the judge even pointed out that ‘the trial was followed by public opinion”.
An important act of solidarity is the subscription campaign just launched by IPI to support Evrensel and BirGün, among the few independent newspapers left in the Turkish media landscape.
Nurcan Baysal, human rights activist and Kurdish journalist, explained how much more difficult it is to be able to do her job in the south-eastern provinces with a Kurdish majority.
“Here journalists’ activities are shaped by the wars and clashes that take place in the region. After the peace process was interrupted in 2015, journalism has increasingly been associated with terrorism”, the journalist said.
Baysal herself was detained for tweeting against the Turkish army’s intervention in Afrin earlier this year.
“I know for sure that at Diyarbakır’s attorney office there is a person tasked with monitoring my activities on social media”, adds the activist, who stresses that she was only released “thanks to the sensation stirred in Europe by my arrest” .
Journalist Mehveş Evin, who after a long career at mainstream newspaper Milliyet works for the portals Artı Gerçek and Yeni Yaşam, explains that even small, symbolic gestures of support can influence the morale of journalists in jail, letting them know – and those who keep them imprisoned – that they are not alone.
“Sending books or letters is a very good way to demonstrate this support”.
Tora Pekin, a lawyer in the Cumhuriyet trial, stressed that the support received from the international media has been essential. Likewise, the civil actions brought by human rights organisations, IPI, and other press organisations that intervened in Cumhuriyet case before the European Court of Human Rights (https://ipi.media/groups-intervene-in-cumhuriyet-case-before-echr/) are a very strong act of support, said Pekin.
Continuing solidarity actions in the face of legal, judicial, and financial pressures affecting journalists in Turkey remains essential. However, according to journalist Bülent Mumay, European funds to support journalism in Turkey or donations from other foundations such as the Open Society or the European Endowment for Democracy are useful, but not sustainable in the long term.
According to Fatih Polat, what Turkey needs is financial support that does not damage the profession’s ethics, but is above all support to the democratic culture of the country as a whole.
This publication has been produced within the project European Centre for Press and Media Freedom, co-funded by the European Commission. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso and its partners and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The project’s page
The article was republished from Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT) with permission.